Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Effects of a Recovery-Focused Program for Stress Management in Women — An Exploratory Study
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Psychology. (Researchgroup for Behavioral Medicine and Health Psychology)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7256-349X
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Psychology. (Researchgroup for Behavioral Medicine and Health Psychology)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0219-9490
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4116-5501
2014 (English)In: Health, ISSN 1949-4998, E-ISSN 1949-5005, Vol. 06, no 20, p. 2825-2836Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Current research indicates that stress problems primarily could be conceptualized as deficiencies in recovery and recuperation between stress periods. Accordingly, interventions should put more emphasis on this aspect. A group based intervention program focusing exclusively on recovery behavior in everyday life was evaluated in this quasi-experimental, waiting-list control group study, where the control group was also treated in a second phase. Thirty-two self-referred female subjects, considering themselves in need of treatment for stress related health problems, were available for analyzes. Fifteen of these constituted the first phase treatment group (INT), while the remaining 17 subjects were placed on waiting list (WLC). Adding a few late applicants leaved 20 subjects later treated in the second intervention phase. Significant and clinically meaningful positive effects emerged in the INT—compared to the WLC-group on recovery behaviors, stress—and recovery experiences, as well as on burn-out symptoms, worry, anxiety and depression. Secondary analyzes of all treated subjects indicated that the positive change the primary clinical endpoint was predicted by the increase in frequency of recovery behaviors and by the decrease in the worrylevel. Thus, the present intervention model merits further research with more rigorous experimental design as well as with follow-up assessments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 06, no 20, p. 2825-2836
Keywords [en]
Stress, Recovery, Stress Management, Intervention, Cognitive Behavior Therapy
National Category
Psychology Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-24161DOI: 10.4236/health.2014.620321OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-24161DiVA, id: diva2:781481
Projects
Stress related illness – mainly too little recovery, not too much stress!
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2010-0654Available from: 2015-01-16 Created: 2015-01-16 Last updated: 2025-09-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Intervening Stress Recovery Behaviors in Everyday Life
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Intervening Stress Recovery Behaviors in Everyday Life
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background. High levels of perceived stress and stress-related ill health, such as burnout, are common in many countries. Several theories postulate that stress behaviors promote adaption to environmental changes and if sustained they are potentially harmful for the body. In accordance, impaired stress recovery behaviors, i.e., psychophysiological deactivation after periods of stress behaviors, have been suggested to be a critical factor in explaining stress-related ill health. Whereas research shows that interventions targeting stress reactivity can have beneficial effects on stress-related variables, studies on interventions targeting stress recovery are surprisingly few. Also, the number of validated instruments for measuring behaviors important for stress recovery are few, in particular easily used self-rating scales. 

Aims. The primary aim of the thesis was to evaluate stress and health-related effects of an intervention targeting stress recovery behaviors in everyday life among people perceiving high levels of stress in life. A secondary aim was to validate a self-report scale measuring behaviors important for stress recovery in everyday life. 

Method. Three empirical studies were conducted to evaluate effects of the behavioral stress recovery intervention “balance in everyday life”, which solely aims at strengthening stress recovery behaviors in everyday life. First, a brief version of the intervention was investigated through a small pilot study in which a single-subject experimental design was used (study 1). After that, the intervention was exploratively tested in a group format in which a quasi-experimental design was used (study 2). Due to the positive results of these two studies, a larger scale study using a randomized controlled design was conducted in order to further investigate the effects of the intervention when delivered in a group format (study 3). To fulfill the secondary aim of the thesis, the Recovery Experience Questionnaire was translated into Swedish and analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (study 4). 

Results. In study 1, data demonstrated immediate reduction of stress symptoms as a function of the intervention. The improvements were maintained at 1-year and 5-year follow-up assessments. In study 2, in comparison with a waiting-list-control group, the intervention yielded statistically significant improvements between pre- and postintervention assessment on eleven out of twelve stress and health-related variables. Medium to large between-groups effect sizes were demonstrated for the primary outcome measures covering (potential) recovery behaviors, perceived stress and rest and experiences of being recovered. In the third study, statistically significant improvements for all outcome measures at postintervention assessment and at the 3-month follow-up were demonstrated. The between-groups effect sizes for the primary measures - perceived stress, tension, and burnout - were medium-to-high at postintervention assessment and at follow-up. In addition, in all studies the intervention was associated with beneficial changes in levels of anxiety and depression. In the last study, support was found for the proposed four-factor structure of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire. 

Conclusions. The results clearly indicate that the intervention “balance in everyday life” improves stress and health-related factors in a relatively satisfactory way among people perceiving high levels of stress in life. The empirical support is strongest for the reduction in tension, perceived stress, burnout, anxiety and depression, and to deliver the intervention in a group format. The studies demonstrated results that warrant further investigation of the effects of “balance in everyday life”, for example in different contexts, and to study other behavioral recovery interventions. To test (potential) recovery facilitating behaviors as mediators of intervention effects, such as reduction in burnout, the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire could be used.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University, 2022. p. 124
Series
Mid Sweden University doctoral thesis, ISSN 1652-893X ; 366
National Category
Applied Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-44995 (URN)978-91-89341-54-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-06-17, F234, Kunskapens väg 8, Östersund, 10:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-05-17 Created: 2022-05-16 Last updated: 2025-09-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2637 kB)1638 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2637 kBChecksum SHA-512
81b3bf1212e799de6d55a91accae8f665fec40f297e21e006375134d20c4c264273cfab7321e78b860d72ac9f1be109c2e0c5c16b64b00f973c246aba213c734
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Lisspers, JanAlmén, NiclasSundin, Örjan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lisspers, JanAlmén, NiclasSundin, Örjan
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Health
PsychologyOther Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1645 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1756 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf