Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Behind the myth - few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Health Sciences.
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4067-2357
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Health Sciences.
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6985-6729
2011 (English)In: Midwifery, ISSN 0266-6138, E-ISSN 1532-3099, Vol. 27, no 5, p. 620-627Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: to describe the prevalence of women's preference for caesarean section as expressed in mid pregnancy, late pregnancy and one year post partum. An additional aim was to identify associated factors and investigate reasons for the preference. Design: mixed methods. Data were collected from 2007 to 2008 through questionnaires distributed to a Swedish regional cohort of women. The survey was part of a longitudinal study of women's attitudes and beliefs related to childbirth. One open question regarding the reasons for the preferred mode of birth was analysed using content analysis. Setting: three hospitals in the county of Västernorrland in the middle of Sweden. Participants: 1506 women were recruited at the routine ultrasound screening during weeks 17 to 19 of their pregnancy. Findings: a preference for caesarean section was stated by 7.6% of women during mid pregnancy and by 7.0% in late pregnancy. One year post partum 9.8% of the women stated that they would prefer a caesarean section if they were to have another baby. This was related to their birth experience. There were more multiparous women who wished for a caesarean section. Associated factors irrespective of parity were fear of giving birth and a 'strongly disagree' response to the statement regarding that the preferred birth should be as natural as possible. Among multiparous women the strongest predictors were previous caesarean sections, particularly those that were elective, and a previous negative birth experience. Women's comments on their preferred mode of birth revealed five categories: women described caesarean section as their only option relating to obstetrical and/or medical factors; several women stated ambivalent feelings and almost as many described their previous birthing experiences as a reason to prefer a caesarean birth; childbirth-related fear and caesarean section as a safe option were the remaining categories. Key conclusions: rising caesarean section rates seem to be related to factors other than women's preferences. Ambivalence towards a way of giving birth is common during pregnancy. This should be of concern for midwives and obstetricians during antenatal care. Information and counselling should be frequent and comprehensive when a discussion on caesarean section is initiated by the pregnant woman. A negative birth experience is related to a future preference for caesarean section and this should be considered by caregivers providing intrapartum care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 27, no 5, p. 620-627
Keywords [en]
Caesarean section; Maternal preference; Mixed method
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-10437DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005ISI: 000295690300015PubMedID: 20630634Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-80052664250OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-10437DiVA, id: diva2:278718
Available from: 2009-11-29 Created: 2009-11-29 Last updated: 2025-09-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Kejsarsnitt utan medicinsk indikation: Attityder, förekomst och önskemål
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Kejsarsnitt utan medicinsk indikation: Attityder, förekomst och önskemål
2010 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sundsvall: Mittuniversitetet, 2010. p. 77
Series
Mid Sweden University doctoral thesis, ISSN 1652-893X ; 82
Keywords
Förekomst, kejsarsnitt utan medicinsk indikation, kvinnors önskemål och erfarenheter, vårdgivarattityd
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-11566 (URN)978-91-86073-71-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-05-21, M 108, Lubbesalen, Holmgatan 10, Sundsvall, 10:30 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Projects
Kejsarsnitt - nödutgång eller genväg?Föda barn i Västernorrland
Available from: 2010-06-02 Created: 2010-05-31 Last updated: 2025-09-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Karlström, AnnikaNystedt, AstridJohansson, MargaretaHildingsson, Ingegerd

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlström, AnnikaNystedt, AstridJohansson, MargaretaHildingsson, Ingegerd
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Midwifery
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 273 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf