Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Deepfake Detection: Human Performance Versus AI Tools: A Comparison of Accuracy and Effectiveness
IULM, Milan, Italy .
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Education. (CER)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1984-7917
2025 (English)In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on AI Research (ICAIR 2025) / [ed] Renata Paola Dameri, Genoa, Italy: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 2025, Vol. 5, p. 156-164Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Image manipulation is a phenomenon much older than digital image handling and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). In the digital era, researchers have made a distinction between cheapfakes and deepfakes. The creation of cheapfakes requires a relatively low technical editing level and does not depend on any GenAI technology. This study had a focus on deepfakes only and explored the role of GenAI in the generation of deepfakes as well as the role of AI in tools for detecting deepfakes. The term deepfakes refers to high-quality and synthetic media content created with the use of deep learning and generative artificial intelligence. Recent advances in deepfake generation have made such content even more realistic, making it harder to identify. The rise of AI-convincing content is a growing social issue that poses serious challenges for its detection. Although the importance of deepfake detection is widely recognized, research comparing the performance of humans and AI on deepfakes analysis is still in its early stages. This study addresses this gap by conducting a comparison between human analysis and AI-based detection tools to evaluate their accuracy and effectiveness in identifying deepfakes. The testing was based on a set of AI-generated images related to the Israel–Hamas war, which were circulated on social media during 2023-2024. Future research should focus on testing a broader range of AI-based detectors to evaluate their effectiveness against different types of deepfakes, such as video, music, audio, text, including less sophisticated AI-generated manipulations as cheapfakes

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Genoa, Italy: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 2025. Vol. 5, p. 156-164
Keywords [en]
Deepfake, AI, GenAI, AI-detection, Detection tools, image manipulation
National Category
Media and Communication Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-56137DOI: 10.34190/icair.5.1.4070ISBN: 978-1-917204-69-9 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-56137DiVA, id: diva2:2019383
Conference
ICAIR 2025
Projects
FAITHAvailable from: 2025-12-05 Created: 2025-12-05 Last updated: 2025-12-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1814 kB)313 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1814 kBChecksum SHA-512
4ff877d9ad60ee537120a821077e94fdde3aa6b32a2ad1202aa632d09622869cc437e5899e15b7a590947b25706289d10b652fa6b23e7ff29604dbbcac91be31
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Mozelius, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mozelius, Peter
By organisation
Department of Education
Media and Communication Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 754 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf