Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Language that Supports Sustainable Development: How to Write about People in Universal Design Policy
Göteborgs universitet. (Institutionen för svenska)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0011-5030
Södertörn University .ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5539-739X
Lunds Universitet, Institutionen för arkitektur och byggd miljö.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4135-2331
Lunds universitet, Instititutionen för designvetenskaper. (Design)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0962-2899
2020 (English)In: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 12, no 22, p. 1-20Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Universal Design (UD) is a design approach that recognises and anticipates diversity as a fundamental human condition. UD is also frequently referred to in relation to the social dimension of sustainable development. Central to both UD and sustainability is the way “everyone,” as the target of UD and sustainability goals, is understood. The purpose of the study is to identify how UD’s “everyone” is conceptualised in Swedish UD policy and to provide a set of recommendations for how to categorise people with regards to UD. A qualitative text analysis is used, which investigates semiotic modes in relation to the content, form, and social relations of texts. Based on the analysis, two challenges for UD policy are identified: (i) how to convey that UD is design for everyone, and (ii) how to move away from a thought pattern of norm and deviation. Seven recommendations for how to approach categorisations of people in UD policy are formulated. We argue that an adoption of UD has the potential to bring about sustainable living environments for all, if integrated with social, economic, environmental, and spatial dimensions of development, but that in order for this to succeed, careful attention needs to be paid to how UD is conceptualised, and a radically different way of categorising people is necessary.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG , 2020. Vol. 12, no 22, p. 1-20
Keywords [en]
Universal Design, categorisation, sustainability, language, policy, rekommendation, disability
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics Architecture Design Architectural Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-53457DOI: 10.3390/su12229561Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85096207914OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-53457DiVA, id: diva2:1923701
Funder
Vinnova, 2018-05232Available from: 2024-12-30 Created: 2024-12-30 Last updated: 2025-09-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hedvall, Per-Olof

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ericsson, StinaWojahn, DanielSandström, IdaHedvall, Per-Olof
In the same journal
Sustainability
General Language Studies and LinguisticsArchitectureDesignArchitectural Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf