Mittuniversitetet

miun.sePublikationer
Driftstörningar
Det förekommer återkommande driftstörningar på några av sök-portalerna på grund av hög belastning. Vi arbetar på att lösa problemet, ni kan tillfälligt mötas av ett felmeddelande.
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Behavioral stress recovery management intervention for people with high levels of perceived stress: A randomized controlled trial
Mittuniversitetet, Fakulteten för humanvetenskap, Institutionen för psykologi och socialt arbete.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0219-9490
Mittuniversitetet, Fakulteten för humanvetenskap, Institutionen för psykologi och socialt arbete.
Stockholms Universitet.
Mittuniversitetet, Fakulteten för humanvetenskap, Institutionen för psykologi och socialt arbete.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-4116-5501
2020 (Engelska)Ingår i: International Journal of Stress Management, ISSN 1072-5245, E-ISSN 1573-3424, Vol. 27, nr 2, s. 183-194Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Continuous and prolonged exposure to stressors or unsuccessfully dealing with such exposure has been suggested as precursors for burnout. Current research indicates that such stress problems could be conceptualized as deficiencies in recovery between periods of stress. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a behaviorally oriented stress recovery management intervention for people experiencing high levels of stress. A total of 73 individuals with experiences of stress symptoms and high levels of perceived stress (≥ 25 on the Perceived Stress Scale) were randomly allocated to either a 10-week intervention group or a waiting-list control group. Participants were assessed at preintervention, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. The Perceived Stress Scale, questions about tension, and the Shirom–Melamed Burnout Questionnaire were used as primary outcome measures, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used as a secondary outcome measure. Data were analyzed following the intention-to-treat principle. The analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvements for all measures at posttreatment and at follow-up. The between-groups effect sizes were high at posttreatment and moderate–to-high at follow-up. Intervention focused on stress recovery behavior seems to be an effective way of reducing perceived stress, tension, burnout symptoms, anxiety, and depression in people with stress symptoms and high levels of perceived stress in everyday life. The tested intervention warrants further research. Other stress recovery behavior interventions need to be tested to draw conclusions on the efficacy of stress recovery behavior interventions in general regarding stress and burnout.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2020. Vol. 27, nr 2, s. 183-194
Nationell ämneskategori
Psykologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-37517DOI: 10.1037/str0000140ISI: 000529343600008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85071645177OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-37517DiVA, id: diva2:1359952
Tillgänglig från: 2019-10-10 Skapad: 2019-10-10 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-09-25Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Intervening Stress Recovery Behaviors in Everyday Life
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Intervening Stress Recovery Behaviors in Everyday Life
2022 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Background. High levels of perceived stress and stress-related ill health, such as burnout, are common in many countries. Several theories postulate that stress behaviors promote adaption to environmental changes and if sustained they are potentially harmful for the body. In accordance, impaired stress recovery behaviors, i.e., psychophysiological deactivation after periods of stress behaviors, have been suggested to be a critical factor in explaining stress-related ill health. Whereas research shows that interventions targeting stress reactivity can have beneficial effects on stress-related variables, studies on interventions targeting stress recovery are surprisingly few. Also, the number of validated instruments for measuring behaviors important for stress recovery are few, in particular easily used self-rating scales. 

Aims. The primary aim of the thesis was to evaluate stress and health-related effects of an intervention targeting stress recovery behaviors in everyday life among people perceiving high levels of stress in life. A secondary aim was to validate a self-report scale measuring behaviors important for stress recovery in everyday life. 

Method. Three empirical studies were conducted to evaluate effects of the behavioral stress recovery intervention “balance in everyday life”, which solely aims at strengthening stress recovery behaviors in everyday life. First, a brief version of the intervention was investigated through a small pilot study in which a single-subject experimental design was used (study 1). After that, the intervention was exploratively tested in a group format in which a quasi-experimental design was used (study 2). Due to the positive results of these two studies, a larger scale study using a randomized controlled design was conducted in order to further investigate the effects of the intervention when delivered in a group format (study 3). To fulfill the secondary aim of the thesis, the Recovery Experience Questionnaire was translated into Swedish and analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (study 4). 

Results. In study 1, data demonstrated immediate reduction of stress symptoms as a function of the intervention. The improvements were maintained at 1-year and 5-year follow-up assessments. In study 2, in comparison with a waiting-list-control group, the intervention yielded statistically significant improvements between pre- and postintervention assessment on eleven out of twelve stress and health-related variables. Medium to large between-groups effect sizes were demonstrated for the primary outcome measures covering (potential) recovery behaviors, perceived stress and rest and experiences of being recovered. In the third study, statistically significant improvements for all outcome measures at postintervention assessment and at the 3-month follow-up were demonstrated. The between-groups effect sizes for the primary measures - perceived stress, tension, and burnout - were medium-to-high at postintervention assessment and at follow-up. In addition, in all studies the intervention was associated with beneficial changes in levels of anxiety and depression. In the last study, support was found for the proposed four-factor structure of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire. 

Conclusions. The results clearly indicate that the intervention “balance in everyday life” improves stress and health-related factors in a relatively satisfactory way among people perceiving high levels of stress in life. The empirical support is strongest for the reduction in tension, perceived stress, burnout, anxiety and depression, and to deliver the intervention in a group format. The studies demonstrated results that warrant further investigation of the effects of “balance in everyday life”, for example in different contexts, and to study other behavioral recovery interventions. To test (potential) recovery facilitating behaviors as mediators of intervention effects, such as reduction in burnout, the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire could be used.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University, 2022. s. 124
Serie
Mid Sweden University doctoral thesis, ISSN 1652-893X ; 366
Nationell ämneskategori
Tillämpad psykologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-44995 (URN)978-91-89341-54-8 (ISBN)
Disputation
2022-06-17, F234, Kunskapens väg 8, Östersund, 10:00 (Svenska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2022-05-17 Skapad: 2022-05-16 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-09-25Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Almén, NiclasLisspers, JanSundin, Örjan

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Almén, NiclasLisspers, JanSundin, Örjan
Av organisationen
Institutionen för psykologi och socialt arbete
I samma tidskrift
International Journal of Stress Management
Psykologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 2812 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf