Open this publication in new window or tab >>2007 (English)In: IECON 2007: 33RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, New York: IEEE conference proceedings, 2007, p. 2242-2247Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
This paper presents the analysis for joint angle measurement on rigid body that is based on distributed biaxial MEMS accelerometers. It focuses on two methods, one called CMR and another DCMR, and utilizes the property of rigid body kinematics to explain their advantages and weaknesses. Unlike CMR method, DCMR method has no requirement on placing the sensors close to the joint center. This provides greater flexibility for the sensor installation. On the basis of the error model of CMR method, we give an analysis outlining the advantage of theoretically error-free DCMR method. The sensor calibration and alignment is described and both methods are characterized on a rigid body robot arm model. The experiment shows the angular error up to 0.4rad from CMR method whereas just 0.03rad from DCMR method. The noise level from both methods is also compared and analyzed. The result reveals a larger but tunable noise for DCMR method.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: IEEE conference proceedings, 2007
Series
IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, ISSN 1553-572X ; 5
Keywords
Sensor
National Category
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-3609 (URN)10.1109/IECON.2007.4459909 (DOI)000253451402030 ()2-s2.0-49949096266 (Scopus ID)4579 (Local ID)1-4244-0783-4 (ISBN)4579 (Archive number)4579 (OAI)
Conference
33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE-Industrial-Electronics-Society, Nov 05-08, 2007, Taipei, Taiwan
Projects
STC - Sensible Things that Communicate
2008-09-302009-07-292025-09-25Bibliographically approved