This study exposes results from five small studies regarding psychological safety and work. The data consists of semi-structured interviews, focus groups interviews and questionnaires with people working as Human resource (HR) managers, schoolteachers, pilots, care assistants in elder care and firefighters in rescue service. One sub study also consists quantitative data. Each partial study penetrates different aspects of psychological safety.
Previous research has revealed psychological safety as an important factor for individuals to perform well together with others at workplaces. A psychological safe condition is defined as a condition when one feels included, safe to learn, safe to contribute and safe to challenge the status quo without fear of being embarrassed, marginalized or punished in some way (Edmondson, 1999). Previous research has also revealed that psychological safety affects learning and efficiency at a workplace positively, (Edmondson & Lei, 2014). Psychological safety as also been found to have positive correlations with work engagement (May et al., 2004; Nembhard & Edmondson, 2006; Chinelato et al., 2020; Lee & Ok, 2014). Other studies have revealed that psychological safety indirectly has effects for workplace conditions. Rothmann and Rothmann, 2010, revealed that psychological safety might be seen as a mediator as it has a positive effect on supervisor relations as in turn has a positive effect on work engagement.
Research on psychological safety has been predominantly quantitative. There is a pent-up need for qualitative research with the aim of studying how people in different contexts experience psychological safety. This study consists of five different sub studies that has explored psychological safety in different contexts. Four of them has a qualitative design.
Methodology
Four studies with a qualitative design were conducted. Each included persons with different occupational categories and had slightly different framing of questions. The Fifth (study II, had a quantitative approach. However, all of them had an overall focus on psychological safety, (Edmondson, 1999).
Thirty-six interviews with human resource managers, fire fighters, hospital health care staff and elder care staff was conducted. Furthermore, 63 teachers answered a questionnaire with questions concerning psychological safety, work engagement and hope.
Each sub study had its own design and data were collected through in-depth interviews, semi-structured interviews or focus group interviews or questionnaires. The meta-analysis was conducted with a qualitative approach and aimed to find common denominators linked to psychological safety in the five sub studies.
Study I, Semi-structured interviews with six Human Resource managers. The purpose of this sub-study was to gain an in-depth understanding of how HR strategists discuss the various components within psychological safety, how these are connected, and which are handled, and which need to be elucidated more deeply in the HR strategic work.
Study II, sixty-three secondary upper schoolteachers answered a questionnaire with questions of how they experienced psychological safety, work engagement and hope at work. The goal with the study was to explore how the three factors were related to each other.
Study III, semi structured interviews with medical doctors and nurses working at a hospital. The aim in this study was to explore how external factors such as working conditions, budget issues and leadership philosophies might have implications for psychological safety.
Study IV, focus group interviews and interviews with nurses and people working with elder care. The study also involved an interview with a first line manager. In this study, the theoretical starting point was linked to social psychological aspects such how, for example, stereotypes risk affecting the psychological safety in a work group.
Study V, semi-structured interviews with eight persons working as firefighters in rescue service teams. The purpose with his sub-study was to gain a deeper understanding of how firefighters experience psychological safety in critical and get a better understanding of how psychological safety emerge in groups and if affects perception of results, cooperation and risk-taking.
Preliminary results
The results will be finalized at latest in January 2023, when the analyse of the results for study III-V are finished. The results from the first two sub studies are done. The results of study I reveal that what is perceived as most central to create psychological safety rests on first-line managers. However, to achieve this requires strategies at central level (HR) and continues training of the managers. The results from study II revealed that hope had a significant positive correlation with work engagement while psychological safety did not have that. This indicates that interventions aimed at increasing teachers' hope could be associated with an improvement in their work engagement.