Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Women's attitudes towards fertility and childbearing - A study based on a national sample of Swedish women validating the Attitudes to Fertility and Childbearing Scale (AFCS)
Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Inst Reprod Hlth, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Inst Reprod Hlth, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences. Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Inst Reprod Hlth, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6985-6729
2015 (English)In: Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare, ISSN 1877-5756, E-ISSN 1877-5764, Vol. 6, no 2, p. 54-58Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: A delay in childbearing has been reported in high-resource countries. Factors reported to impact postponement include being mature enough, completing studies, and receiving a good salary. Other reasons are the partner relationship, efficient forms of contraception, value changes, housing conditions, and economic uncertainty. The aim of the study was to validate the previously developed instrument Attitudes to Fertility and Childbearing Scale (AFCS) in a sample of Swedish women and to relate the components to the women's socio-demographic characteristics. Methods: Four hundred and twenty-four women, 20-30 years of age, who were not mothers answered and returned the questionnaire. Statistical analysis was conducted; construct validity using principal comwomen's background characteristics. ponent analysis (PCA), Student's t-test, and ANOVA was performed between the three components and women's background characteristics. Results: The two components with highest loadings were Importance for future and Hindrance at present, indicating a time conflict. The third component was Female identity. The youngest women, single women, students, and women living in large cities were more likely to score high with the component Hindrance at present. Women having a partner were more likely to score high on Importance for future and Female identity. Conclusion: In this population, age, occupation, residential area, and civil (marital) status play a role in the attitudes towards fertility and childbearing. Fertility in relation to individual differences and age needs to be informed and discussed in society as well as in sexual and reproductive health care. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 6, no 2, p. 54-58
Keywords [en]
Attitudes, Fertility, Childbearing, Scale, Women, Principal component analysis
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-25681DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2015.01.002ISI: 000356114400003PubMedID: 25998871Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84929517701OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-25681DiVA, id: diva2:849154
Available from: 2015-08-27 Created: 2015-08-18 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hildingsson, Ingegerd

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hildingsson, Ingegerd
By organisation
Department of Nursing Sciences
In the same journal
Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 90 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf