miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Utilization and implications of the Static-99 in practice
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada .
2012 (English)In: Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment, ISSN 1079-0632, E-ISSN 1573-286X, Vol. 24, no 3, 289-302 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Static-99 is the most commonly used risk assessment instrument for sexual violence in North America and its results can affect highly consequential decisions made in the criminal and civil justice systems. Despite its influence, few studies have systematically examined how the Static-99 is used by clinicians in practice. The current study compares the Static-99 ratings of clinicians to those of researchers for 100 adult males who completed an outpatient sex offender treatment program and were followed up over an average of about 4 years. Results showed good agreement between the ratings of clinicians and researchers for total scores on the Static-99, as well as for most individual items. Ratings by clinicians tended to be slightly lower than those made by researchers. The predictive validity of ratings made by clinicians and researchers was very similar and moderate in terms of effect size. In 30 cases, clinicians used discretion to "override" or adjust the Static-99 ratings when making final risk judgments, but the predictive validity of the clinical adjusted ratings was worse than that of the original Static-99 ratings made by clinicians. The need for quality assurance and training are discussed along with the need for clear empirically supported guidelines regarding overrides. © The Author(s) 2012.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 24, no 3, 289-302 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-22987DOI: 10.1177/1079063211423943Scopus ID: 84860132689OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-22987DiVA: diva2:746952
Note

cited By (since 1996)4

Available from: 2014-09-15 Created: 2014-09-15 Last updated: 2016-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Storey, Jennifer
In the same journal
Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf