miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Community based wildlife management failing to link conservation and financial viability
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Business, Economics and Law. Namibian Competition Commission, Windhoek, Namibia.
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Business, Economics and Law. Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm Technol & Social Sci, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7206-6568
2015 (English)In: Animal Conservation, ISSN 1367-9430, E-ISSN 1469-1795, Vol. 18, no 1, p. 4-13Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Given the considerable popularity of community-based wildlife management as a conservation tool, it is of interest to assess the long-run sustainability of this policy not only in conservation terms, but also in financial terms. In this paper, we use cost–benefit analysis to study the social and financial sustainability of a large set of community conservancies in Namibia, one of the few countries where community-based wildlife management policies have been in place long enough to assess their long-term viability. We find that, although the social sustainability is generally good, the financial sustainability is problematic – especially for the younger conservancies: there is no real link between conservation achievements and financial success. This calls into question the long-term sustainability of many of these conservancies: if they are unable to generate enough revenue to pay for their running expenditure, they will eventually fail – even if they are successful from a conservation point of view. Similar problems, linked to the way in which external funders have pushed for additional conservancies to be established regardless of financial considerations, are likely to be present in other countries that have implemented such programmes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 18, no 1, p. 4-13
Keywords [en]
benefit-sharing; community conservancies; community-based wildlife management; cost-benefit analysis; financial sustainability; policy; Namibia; southern Africa
National Category
Economics Ecology Social and Economic Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-20114DOI: 10.1111/acv.12134ISI: 000348900200002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84921515225OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-20114DiVA, id: diva2:661577
Conference
Environment for Development 7th Annual Meeting
Projects
Agriculture in African countries - information and market power
Funder
Swedish Research Council FormasThe Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius FoundationAvailable from: 2013-11-04 Created: 2013-11-04 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Stage, Jesper

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stage, Jesper
By organisation
Department of Business, Economics and Law
In the same journal
Animal Conservation
EconomicsEcologySocial and Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf