miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Perpetrator programmes for partner violence: A rejoinder to Respect
Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Psychol, Preston PR1 3TQ, Lancs, England .
Univ Birmingham, Ctr Forens & Criminol Psychol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England .
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Social Sciences.
2012 (English)In: Legal and Criminological Psychology, ISSN 1355-3259, E-ISSN 2044-8333, Vol. 17, no 2, p. 225-232Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose. To reply to the comments made by Debbonaire and Todd (2012) in relation to our critique of Respect's Position Statement. Method. We examined their reply in relation to our original article and to the wider research literature. Results. We show that Debbonaire and Todd's reply is largely a series of assertions, for which little or no supporting evidence is offered. Their argument is first that we are misplaced in criticizing their Position Statement, and second that the main points of the statement are defendable. We indicate why our criticisms of the statement still stand. Conclusions. We argue that Respect have not countered our overall criticism of their position that intimate partner violence (IPV) can only be addressed as a gendered issue, that is as a consequence of patriarchal values enacted at the individual level. Instead we advocate a gender-inclusive approach applying a knowledge base derived from robust empirical research on IPV and more widely from research on human aggression.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 17, no 2, p. 225-232
Keywords [en]
domestic violence; feminism; gender bias; health service; homicide; human; medical practice; medical research; offender; partner violence; police; prevalence; priority journal; victim
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-17279DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02061.xISI: 000306647700004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84864208052OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-17279DiVA, id: diva2:563575
Note

Preceding article by the same authors: Archer, J; et al. "Perpetrator programmes for partner violence: Are they based on ideology or evidence?" Legal and criminological psychology. Sep 2012. 17 (2). pp196-215. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02029.x

Available from: 2012-10-30 Created: 2012-10-29 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Graham-Kevan, Nicola

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Graham-Kevan, Nicola
By organisation
Department of Social Sciences
In the same journal
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and EpidemiologySocial Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 95 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf