miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
NETWORKS OF INNOVATION IN IS RESEARCH: AN EXPLORATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORKS AND H-FAMILY INDICES
University de Nantes, France. (Scholarly Influence Research (SIR))
North Carolina Central University. (Scholarly Influence Research (SIR))
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Science, Technology and Media, Department of Information Technology and Media. (VAlIT; Scholarly Influence Research (SIR))
Hull University Business School (UK). (Scholarly Influence Research (SIR))
2011 (English)In: ECIS 2011 Proceedings European Conference on Information Systems / [ed] Matti Rossi & Joe Nandhakumar, Helsinki, Finland: ECIS , 2011Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Assessing the work of scholars is of great importance in the life of academic institutions, disciplines and scholars. Research suggests that that the notion of ‘scholarly influence’ should be substituted for current approaches towards judging scholarship (Truex et al. 2009). This paper seeks to examine the nature of the construct ‘scholarly influence’ by reconceptualising the activity of academic research as a social process of peer production enacted through networks of innovation. It combines techniques used to assess ‘ideational influence’– a measure of the productivity and the uptake of an author’s ideas – and techniques used in social network analysis to assess ‘social influence’ – patterns of social interaction measured as co-authored publications in journals and conferences. The analysis suggests that social and ideational influence appear to be inter-related; those with high citation indices are also well connected. Rather than argue causality we have proposed that the two are mutually reinforcing and that an assessment of researcher impact should take account of both when looking for indicators that might have predictive power. Given that citations are backward looking it is possible that measures of social influence, such as closeness to highly ranked scholars as evidenced by co-authorship networks, will provide a useful forward looking indicator. Promotion boards might consider social network and citations when considering a researcher in the round.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Helsinki, Finland: ECIS , 2011.
Keywords [en]
Peer production, open innovation, scholarly influence, social network analysis (SNA), ideational influence, social influence, H-family indices, bibliometrics.
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-14908Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84870640496OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-14908DiVA, id: diva2:459534
Conference
ECIS 2011- Helsinki
Projects
SIRAvailable from: 2011-12-11 Created: 2011-11-25 Last updated: 2018-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Scopus

Authority records BETA

Truex, Duane

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Truex, Duane
By organisation
Department of Information Technology and Media
Computer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf