miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Advantages and Limitations of Comparing Audience Responses to Televised Debates: A Comparative Study of Germany and Sweden
University of Koblenz-Landau.
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Science, Technology and Media, Department of Information Technology and Media. (Demokratiinstitutet Demicom)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5964-102X
2009 (English)In: Real-Time Response Measurement in the Social Sciences / [ed] Jürgen Maier, Michaela Maier, Marcus Maurer, Carsten Reinemann & Vincent Meyer, Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing Group, 2009, 1, p. 97-116Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing Group, 2009, 1. p. 97-116
Keywords [en]
Televised Debates, Real-time response measurement, comparative research, effects
National Category
Media and Communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-10476Local ID: DEMICOMISBN: 978-3-631-57743-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-10476DiVA, id: diva2:279261
Available from: 2009-12-02 Created: 2009-12-02 Last updated: 2014-05-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Strömbäck, Jesper

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Strömbäck, Jesper
By organisation
Department of Information Technology and Media
Media and Communications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1020 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf