Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The use of the concept of transition in different disciplines within health and social welfare: An integrative literature review
Jönköping University, HHJ, Avdelningen för naturvetenskap och biomedicin.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2786-707x
Jönköping University, HHJ, Avdelningen för socialt arbete.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7341-945X
Jönköping University, HHJ, Avdelningen för omvårdnad.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7406-8732
Jönköping University, HHJ. ADULT.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8945-6458
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Nursing Open, E-ISSN 2054-1058, Vol. 6, no 3, p. 664-675Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims

To continuing the quest of the concept of transition in nursing research and to explore how the concept of transition is used in occupational therapy, oral health and social work as well as in interdisciplinary studies in health and welfare, between 2003–2013.

Design

An integrative literature review.

Methods

PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, DOSS, SocIndex, Social Science Citation Index and AMED databases from 2003–2013 were used. Identification of 350 articles including the concept of transition in relation to disciplines included. Assessment of articles are in accordance to Meleis' typologies of transition by experts in each discipline. Chosen key factors were entered into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).

Results

Meleis' four typologies were found in all studied disciplines, except development in oral health. The health‐illness type was the most commonly explored, whereas in social work and in occupation therapy, situational transitions dominated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2019. Vol. 6, no 3, p. 664-675
Keywords [en]
literature review, nursing theory, occupational therapy, oral health, social welfare, social work, theory–practice gap, transition
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-52170DOI: 10.1002/nop2.249ISI: 000476917700002PubMedID: 31367388Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85069778425OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-52170DiVA, id: diva2:1890320
Available from: 2019-03-07 Created: 2024-08-19 Last updated: 2024-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindmark, UlrikaBülow, Pia H.Mårtensson, JanRönning, Helén

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindmark, UlrikaBülow, Pia H.Mårtensson, JanRönning, Helén
In the same journal
Nursing Open
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf