Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of Two Surface Sampling Methods for Microbiological and Chemical Analyses To Assess the Presence of Biofilms in Food Companies
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Food Protection, ISSN 0362-028X, E-ISSN 1944-9097, Vol. 80, no 12, p. 2022-2028Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Biofilms are an important source of contamination in food companies, yet the composition of biofilms in practice is stillmostly unknown. The chemical and microbiological characterization of surface samples taken after cleaning and disinfection isvery important to distinguish free-living bacteria from the attached bacteria in biofilms. In this study, sampling methods that arepotentially useful for both chemical and microbiological analyses of surface samples were evaluated. In the manufacturingfacilities of eight Belgian food companies, surfaces were sampled after cleaning and disinfection using two sampling methods:the scraper–flocked swab method and the sponge stick method. Microbiological and chemical analyses were performed on thesesamples to evaluate the suitability of the sampling methods for the quantification of extracellular polymeric substancecomponents and microorganisms originating from biofilms in these facilities. The scraper–flocked swab method was mostsuitable for chemical analyses of the samples because the material in these swabs did not interfere with determination of thechemical components. For microbiological enumerations, the sponge stick method was slightly but not significantly moreeffective than the scraper–flocked swab method. In all but one of the facilities, at least 20% of the sampled surfaces had more than102 CFU/100 cm2. Proteins were found in 20% of the chemically analyzed surface samples, and carbohydrates and uronic acidswere found in 15 and 8% of the samples, respectively. When chemical and microbiological results were combined, 17% of thesampled surfaces were contaminated with both microorganisms and at least one of the analyzed chemical components; thus, thesesurfaces were characterized as carrying biofilm. Overall, microbiological contamination in the food industry is highly variable byfood sector and even within a facility at various sampling points and sampling times.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 80, no 12, p. 2022-2028
National Category
Microbiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-48134DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-17-210PubMedID: 29140744Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85053925710OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-48134DiVA, id: diva2:1750495
Available from: 2023-04-13 Created: 2023-04-13 Last updated: 2023-05-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Maes, Sharon

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Maes, Sharon
In the same journal
Journal of Food Protection
Microbiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 62 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf