Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the German Version of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Assessment, ISSN 1073-1911, E-ISSN 1552-3489, Vol. 27, no 6, p. 1128-1138Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a widely used diagnostic interview for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Following fundamental modifications in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), the CAPS had to be revised. This study examined the psychometric properties (internal consistency, interrater reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and structural validity) of the German version of the CAPS-5 in a trauma-exposed sample (n = 223 with PTSD; n =51 without PTSD). The results demonstrated high internal consistency (αs =.65-.93) and high interrater reliability (ICCs =.81-.89). With regard to convergent and discriminant validity, we found high correlations between the CAPS severity score and both the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale sum score (r =.87) and the Beck Depression Inventory total score (r =.72). Regarding the underlying factor structure, the hybrid model demonstrated the best fit, followed by the anhedonia model. However, we encountered some nonpositive estimates for the correlations of the latent variables (factors) for both models. The model with the best fit without methodological problems was the externalizing behaviors model, but the results also supported the DSM-5 model. Overall, the results demonstrate that the German version of the CAPS-5 is a psychometrically sound measure.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SAGE Publications Inc. , 2020. Vol. 27, no 6, p. 1128-1138
Keywords [en]
anhedonia, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, human, posttraumatic stress disorder, psychometry, reproducibility, Anhedonia, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-44514DOI: 10.1177/1073191118774840Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85047439033OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-44514DiVA, id: diva2:1642049
Available from: 2022-03-03 Created: 2022-03-03 Last updated: 2024-09-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pfaltz, Monique C.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pfaltz, Monique C.
In the same journal
Assessment
Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf