Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vocabulary learning strategies: The influence they have on student writing
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences.
2018 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This study investigated links between vocabulary strategy use and the range of vocabulary used by learners. Overall, all students participating in this study showed a tendency towards using mostly guessing, encoding strategies, and dictionary use, which was primarily the use of Google translate followed by the use of Swedish-English dictionary and in addition, asking26someone. Of the activation strategies, only memorizing words was used frequently and the rehearsal strategies were rarely used. Only a minor distinction between the use of strategy types between high-achieving and low-achieving students was identified. High achievers tend to use strategies more frequently, and the hypothesis that using effective vocabulary strategies frequently may positively affect the vocabulary growth is supported to some extent. Furthermore, the quantity of strategies affecting the increasing of vocabulary supports the second hypothesis (see section 1.1).

Future research concerning the vocabulary learning strategies’ influence on the student’s vocabulary range should include additional students to the study in order to receive more valid and reliable results. The number of students was a limitation in this study. Also, a larger number of essays from each student may also contribute to more reliable data where a larger quantity of words is analysed, making the result more valid. Moreover, there could be more strategies included in the survey, similar to Gu and Johnson’s (1996) study, which may give further information about the students’ strategy use. This study limited the strategies in the survey to adjust to the participants, where an extensive survey would not have given the requested answers. Although the present study was limited, it suggests that there may be a link between vocabulary strategy use and the range of vocabulary a student uses, and that further investigation into this relationship would be of value.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 34
National Category
Languages and Literature
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-43878OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-43878DiVA, id: diva2:1615548
Subject / course
English EN1
Educational program
Additional Programme for Teacher Education UPEDG 90 higher education credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Note

Godkänt datum 2018-02-19

Available from: 2021-11-30 Created: 2021-11-30

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
Languages and Literature

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 171 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf