Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the energy consumption and ranging accuracy of ultra-wideband physical interfaces
2020 (English)In: Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2020, article id 9347984Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Ultra-wideband (UWB) communication is attracting increased interest for its high-accuracy distance measurements. However, the typical current consumption of tens to hundreds of mA during transmission and reception might make the technology prohibitive to battery-powered devices in the Internet of Things. The IEEE 802.15.4 standard specifies two UWB physical layer interfaces (PHYs), with low- and high-rate pulse repetition (LRP and HRP, respectively). While the LRP PHY allows a more energy-efficient implementation of the UWB transceiver than its HRP counterpart, the question is whether some ranging quality is lost in exchange. We evaluate the trade-off between power and energy consumption, on the one hand, and distance measurement accuracy and precision, on the other hand, using UWB devices developed by Decawave (HRP) and 3db Access (LRP). We find that the distance measurement errors of 3db Access devices have at most 12 cm higher bias and standard deviation in line-of-sight propagation and 2-3 times higher spread in non-line-of-sight scenarios than those of Decawave devices. However, 3db Access chips consume 10 times less power and 125 times less energy per distance measurement than Decawave ones. Since the LRP PHY has an ultra-low energy consumption, it should be preferred over the HRP PHY when energy efficiency is critical, with a small penalty in the ranging performance. © 2020 IEEE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2020. article id 9347984
Keywords [en]
Accuracy, Distance Measurement, Energy Efficiency, Ultra-Wideband (UWB), Economic and social effects, Energy utilization, IEEE Standards, Physical layer, Pulse repetition rate, Radio transceivers, Battery powered devices, Current consumption, High accuracy distance measurements, IEEE 802.15.4 standards, Line-of-sight propagation, Measurement accuracy, Standard deviation, Ultra-wideband communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-41569DOI: 10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9347984Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100887247ISBN: 9781728182988 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-41569DiVA, id: diva2:1536182
Conference
2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2020; Virtual, Taipei; Taiwan; 7 December 2020 through 11 December 2020
Available from: 2021-03-10 Created: 2021-03-10 Last updated: 2021-04-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Magno, M.

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 282 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf