Mid Sweden University

miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A first exploration of neurocognitive abilities in Swedish school children with and without SEN
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Psychology and Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4653-8415
2020 (English)In: EARLI SIG 15 – Special Educational Needs Biennial Meeting 2020: Learning difficulties and inclusion: Challenges (and solutions) for the future / [ed] Jo Van Herwegen, 2020Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The role of different neurocognitive abilities in learning is well documented. Research also shows that neurocognitive abilities, such as different facets of executive functions (EF) as well as analogical thinking and fluid reasoning abilities (FR) are challenged among children with Special Educational Needs (SEN) and/or Learning Difficulties (LD). However, research on neurocognitive abilities in larger representative samples as well as subgroups of children eligible for SEN support in Swedish school context is sparse. This is of particular interest since the Swedish SEN support eligibility system stresses curricular and knowledge based goal criteria (and not diagnostic (LD) criteria). The Swedish SEN support system is organized in three tiers, offering differentiated and individualized instruction to all children (tier 1), intensified adjustments to some children in an inclusive classroom environment (tier 2), and more prolonged SEN support outside classroom and/or reduced curricula (tier 3). The current study is a first exploration of data drawn from a large study on the relation between different neurocognitive abilities and their role in learning in general, and in children eligible for different type of SEN support in particular. The study reports data from children aged 6 to 16 drawn from a representative sample (n = 471) of Swedish school children on three indices of neurocognitive abilities (attention EF, planning EF and FR). Three groups of children are compared: children without explicit SEN support (tier 1), children with intensified inclusive classroom adjustment support (tier 2), and children with more persistent/outside classroom SEN support (tier 3). Results show that there are significant differences between the three groups with regards to neurocognitive abilities. Preliminary conclusions are drawn about the role of neurocognitive abilities in children with and without SEN in a curriculum-based SEN support delivery system. Also, conclusions for future directions for research are drawn. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020.
Keywords [en]
Special Educational Needs, Neurocognitive Abilities, Three-tiered system, Sweden
National Category
Applied Psychology Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-40571OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-40571DiVA, id: diva2:1503282
Conference
EARLI SIG 15 – Special Educational Needs Biennial Meeting 2020 [DIGITAL] - University College London, Institute of Education, 10-12 august 2020.
Available from: 2020-11-24 Created: 2020-11-24 Last updated: 2020-12-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Partanen, PetriJansson, Billy

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Partanen, PetriJansson, Billy
By organisation
Department of Psychology and Social Work
Applied PsychologyEducational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 432 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf