miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sustainability assessment of low carbon technologies-case study of the building sector in China
College of Environmental Science and Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China.
College of Environmental Science and Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China.
United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies, Tokyo, Japan.
College of Environmental Science and Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China.
2012 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, Vol. 32, p. 244-250Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
Hållbar utveckling
Abstract [en]

In order to meet the goals of GHG reduction and sustainability in industry development, strategies are needed that are reducing GHG emissions without compromising other economic, environmental and social priorities. In this paper, existing low carbon and sustainability requirements and evaluation methods are comparatively analyzed based on an in-depth literature review. Based on this analysis, multi-attributive assessment is selected as the methodological basis of our envisaged assessment framework; modified indicators and classified values are designed accordingly. The building sector in China is analyzed as a case study. Eleven main building energy saving technologies are assessed. The results show that under the sustainability criterion, the priority order of the assessed technologies is as follows: geothermal heat pump; solar thermal; solar PV; air conditioning energy saving; central heating system energy saving; building enclosure; lighting energy conservation; electric water heater energy saving, washing machine energy saving, refrigerator energy saving (these three have equal priority), and cooking appliance energy saving. The GHG and sustainability properties of technologies are discussed by comparing the indicator scores of the two aspects. The designed evaluation method can be used in regional cases if data resources are available; and for other sectors after indicator modification. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 32, p. 244-250
Keywords [en]
Low carbon, Sustainability assessment, Technology, Building enclosure, Building energy saving, Building sectors, Central heating system, Cooking appliances, Data resources, Electric water heaters, Evaluation Method, GHG emission, Industry development, Literature reviews, Priority order, Solar PVs, Solar thermal, Sustainability criteria, Air conditioning, Greenhouse gases, Rating, Washers, Water heaters, Energy conservation
National Category
Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-38015DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.031Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84860999745OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-38015DiVA, id: diva2:1378715
Available from: 2019-12-13 Created: 2019-12-13 Last updated: 2019-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Mauerhofer, Volker

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mauerhofer, Volker
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf