miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
3-d sustainability and its contribution to governance assessment in legal terms: Examples and perspectives
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
2015 (English)In: Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development: Horizontal and Sectorial Policy Issues / [ed] Mauerhofer, V, Springer International Publishing , 2015, p. 35-56Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Environmental, social and economic capitals, capacities and carrying capacities provide the theoretical construct of the three dimensions of a sustainable development. Based thereon, this chapter aims firstly to provide a conceptual overview on two main objectives of multilevel rule of law systems that should be addressed when adapting these systems towards a more sustainable direction. This first aim is addressed based on ‘3-D Sustainability’, a concept offering six flexibly applicable decision-making criteria for priority setting between these sustainability dimensions based on the burden of proof in the sense of the precautionary principle. The theoretical application of these criteria on several real-world examples of legislative acts indicates the concept’s usefulness in practice. The two main objectives identified within this first aim are to stay through international environmental policy within the environmentally sustainable scale and to politically define flexible legal trade-off mechanisms, which more sustainably deal with conflicts among these sustainability dimensions. Secondly, the chapter strives to identify ways to strengthen the application of the existing international environmental legislation. Thus, several innovative mechanisms are identified that overcome current implementation and enforcement deadlocks, without changing existing laws, but also increasing its direct effect. In summary, the chapter innovatively offers—based on ongoing research—several solution proposals for addressing in a sustainable manner geopolitical and organizational scales as well as trade-offs when it comes to re-writing existing environmental legal institutions (de lege ferenda). It further provides proposals for the innovative implementation of existing normativeregimes without modifying legal text (de lege lata). © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer International Publishing , 2015. p. 35-56
Keywords [en]
Multilateral environmental agreement (MEA) law, Practical politics decision support, Sufficiency policy, Three pillars, Trade-off criterion
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-38006DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26021-1_4Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84956968031ISBN: 9783319260211 (print)ISBN: 9783319260198 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-38006DiVA, id: diva2:1378539
Available from: 2019-12-13 Created: 2019-12-13 Last updated: 2019-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Mauerhofer, Volker

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mauerhofer, Volker
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 3 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf