miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Neoliberal Steering in Swedish Integration Policy: the Rise and Fall of Introduction Guides
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Stockholms Universitet.
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences. (forum för genusvetenskap)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9328-1128
2019 (English)In: Offentlig Förvaltning. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, ISSN 2000-8058, E-ISSN 2001-3310, Vol. 23, no 1, p. 23-40Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the past decades, many policy sectors within European countries have encountered political reforms of neoliberal character. One of the key shifts has been the reorientation of public employment services that has been enforced, for example, through the establishment of what have been denoted as quasi-markets. Simultaneously with the rise of quasi-markets, welfare policy as a whole, including integration policy, has beenincreasingly oriented toward “activation”, with its focus on the individual’s obligationsand duties in relation to welfare services. These circumstances pose particular challenges to those charged with the governance of welfare services due to increasingly complex requirements for collaboration and control involving a multitude of actors. The reform is an example of a hybrid system where for- and non-profit actors compete for the“customer”, in this case, the newly arrived immigrant. This article focuses on the changes in Swedish integration reform as an archetype of these changes and studies a clearly defined case study. Empirically, this study draws from both documents and interviews. The article illustrates an unregulated and ill-monitored policy containing a model that comprises mixed modes of steering. The governance of the reform bears traits from both centralist and cooperative forms of governance and, thereby, involves competing philosophies of steering.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 23, no 1, p. 23-40
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-35294OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-35294DiVA, id: diva2:1272477
Available from: 2018-12-19 Created: 2018-12-19 Last updated: 2019-03-15

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(183 kB)55 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 183 kBChecksum SHA-512
56e8637cb3be085e04b6df6f5636f284f5f4987a73fa9533bd07c4f9d78a66966efe20f16e998836cb43772f5d2eb2cd99ef5bc31dfa3f87045d9fc96f1ae42c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Lidén, GustavNyhlén, Sara

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lidén, GustavNyhlén, Sara
By organisation
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
In the same journal
Offentlig Förvaltning. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 55 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf