miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Emergy Assessment of a Wastewater Treatment Pond System in the Lake Victoria Basin
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Science, Technology and Media, Department of Ecotechnology and Sustainable Building Engineering.
Dept. of Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
IFM, section Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Dept. of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya.
2017 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, ISSN 2325-6192, E-ISSN 2325-6206, Vol. 5, no 1, 11-26 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

As part of efforts to reduce the eutrophying load to Lake Victoria, a wastewater treatment system at one of the sugar factories in Kenya was evaluated with the ecosystem ecology method emergy accounting. As a comparison a traditional cost analysis was also performed. The analysis included the local and imported ecosystem services. After preliminary treatment the effluent was discharged into a series of 12 stabilisation ponds. The removal of COD and TSS was high, whereas phosphorus concentrations were reduced by less than 20 %. The monetary costs were dominated by operation and management cost, some of which could probably be reduced by more effective management. The local ecosystem services in emergy terms contributed only 1% (or 1,000 Em$) to the treatment system. Imported ecosystem services in purchased lime contributed more to the treatment system, 22% (or 24,600 Em$). Since the land costs in the area were low, land demanding treatment methods using free local ecosystem services, could be cost effective choices for wastewater management. Ecosystem ecology methods as emergy accountings can guide these choices by revealing the additional contribution of free ecosystem services. Emergy accountings seem to need further clarification regarding differences in micro-/macroeconomic views.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 5, no 1, 11-26 p.
Keyword [en]
Ecosystem ecology, Sewage treatment, Environmental valuation, Kenya, Stabilization ponds, Oxidation ponds
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-30513DOI: 10.5890/JEAM.2017.03.002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-30513DiVA: diva2:1085297
Available from: 2017-03-28 Created: 2017-03-28 Last updated: 2017-04-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grönlund, Erik
By organisation
Department of Ecotechnology and Sustainable Building Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 22 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf