miun.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What is the effect of prescribed burning in temperate and boreal forest on biodiversity, beyond tree regeneration, pyrophilous and saproxylic species?: A systematic review protocol
Mistra Council for Evidence-Based Environmental Management, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm.
Mistra Council for Evidence-Based Environmental Management, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm.
Mistra Council for Evidence-Based Environmental Management, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm.
Department of Biology, Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Environmental Evidence, ISSN 2047-2382, E-ISSN 2047-2382, Vol. 5, no 1, 1-8 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Forests set aside from productive forestry are often considered best conserved by non-intervention. However, biodiversity is often maintained in natural forests by a background level of disturbance, which, in some forests, takes the form of forest fires. Set-aside forests may therefore benefit from continuation of such disturbances, which, in forests under protection, must be managed anthropogenically. While the effects of prescribed burning on tree regeneration and on pyrophilous and/or saproxylic species in some regions are well known, effects on other organisms are less clear and/or consistent. It would be valuable to broaden the knowledge of how prescribed burning affects forest biodiversity, particularly because this practice is increasingly considered as a conservation management intervention. The primary aim of the proposed systematic review is to clarify how biodiversity is affected by prescribed burning in temperate and boreal forests. The ultimate purpose of the review is to investigate whether and how such prescribed burning may be useful as a means of conserving or restoring biodiversity, beyond that of pyrophilous and saproxylic species, in forest set-asides. Methods: The review will examine primary field studies of how prescribed burning affects biodiversity in boreal and temperate forests. We will consider studies made in such forests anywhere in the world, and will include forests both in protected areas and under commercial management. Non-intervention will be used as a comparator. Relevant outcomes will include a range of measures of biodiversity, including abundance and diversity, but not of pyrophilous and saproxylic species. Relevant studies will be taken from a recent systematic map of the evidence on biodiversity impacts of active management in forests set aside for conservation or restoration. Additional searches and a search update will be undertaken in a subset of databases from the systematic map, using a search string targeted to identify studies focused on prescribed burning interventions. Searches for additional literature will be made in the bibliographies of existing reviews of forest burning. Traditional academic literature and grey literature in English, French, Swedish and Finnish will be considered. Stakeholders who engage in prescribed burning will be asked to provide relevant grey literature.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 5, no 1, 1-8 p.
Keyword [en]
Biodiversity, Boreal forest, Disturbance legacy, Forest conservation, Forest reserve, Forest restoration, Forest set-aside, Habitat management, Prescribed burning, Temperate forest
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-29431DOI: 10.1186/s13750-016-0076-5Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84994837811OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-29431DiVA: diva2:1052019
Available from: 2016-12-05 Created: 2016-12-05 Last updated: 2016-12-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1082 kB)14 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1082 kBChecksum SHA-512
71462bf9baf3a31581f32180933d9ad4f1c4c2b9a0a55b3d02247e0239379100b59eb6c6bfaeda2e2550a246265c3e245a7a60918cce87b706e6f5f8df8e8583
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jonsson, Bengt Gunnar
By organisation
Department of Natural Sciences
In the same journal
Environmental Evidence
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 14 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 69 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf