miun.sePublications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Elevinflytande i gränslandet mellan didaktik och makt – en studie av undervisningspraktiken i tre grundskolor
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Education.
2019 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis focuses on student influence in the borderland between didactics and power. Student influence is ambiguous and the mission of student influence can be interpreted in different ways in Swedish compulsory schools. In the school reforms of the 1990s, the intentions of student influence, based on both moral and political as well as theoretical positions were stated. Student influence was seen as a right, as being important for education in democracy, and as a prerequisite for learning. Democracy, knowledge and learning are essentially contested concepts. As a didactic practice student influence cannot be understood as general impact through learning, nor as fully-fledged democracy. The question of the limitations of student influence is described and analysed in the thesis. The aim is to describe and critically analyse student influence as didactic practice. The research questions that have directed the study are: How is student influence expressed in three different schools, where there has been a particular ambition to implement student influence? What prerequisites are given for student influence in the way teaching is organised and carried out?What possibilities and constraints (conditions) appear, from the perspective of didactics and power? A fourth question links together the empirical study with the problem of the limits of student influence: Can a didactic model be designed for student influence as didactic practice, and if so, how? The study was conducted using an abductive approach and strategy, and with a point of departure in critical realism as scientific approach. Three primary schools, with the particular ambition of implementing the mission of student influence, were studied through a multiple case study design. The empirical material was produced using ethnographic methods. The a didactic framework is used for description, whilst a sociological concept of power has contributed to the construction of analytical tools. Using ‘order’ and ‘renegotiation’ as analytic tools, the conditions for student influence on how teaching is organised and carried out, are described. Responsibility and transparency are tested as conditions, in order to answer the question of possibilities and constraints from the perspective of didactics and power. The analysis of teaching practice in the three schools shows that student influence is complex, and that it has to be understood as local bound and situationally. This impacts on the possibility of understanding its limitations. The results show that experiences and interests of students can concern motivating them to work, adapting teaching to different learning styles, or that the teachers pay attention to their expressions to fostering more generally. Furthermore, all models of democracy, and of different approaches to learning and knowledge are visible in the schools. The importance of classroom discussion for student influence needs to be illuminated, and the distinction between didactic considerations, and what could be understood as unwarranted power. The results are discussed in relation to issues of learning theory and curriculum theory, as well as to ideals of democratic education, to understand the limits of student influence. A didactic model, with three conceptual tools that enable repeated questioning of the limits of student influence, is proposed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University , 2019. , p. 331
Series
Mid Sweden University doctoral thesis, ISSN 1652-893X ; 300
Keywords [en]
compulsory school, democracy, didactic theory and practice, influence, knowledge, learning, multiple case study, power
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-36112ISBN: 978-91-88947-03-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-36112DiVA, id: diva2:1316111
Public defence
2019-08-30, E409, Sundsvall, 10:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2019-05-16 Created: 2019-05-16 Last updated: 2019-05-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

LindaEriksson_doctoralthesis300(4603 kB)208 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4603 kBChecksum SHA-512
f658eed3c334d4e7994ad874a8939720a18911c6eceac563e1b0a37c9232d5ba345292b355574d00e0342d0a8c1c430feeccda976f7e9247915b4f24beb62dbe
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Spikblad(82 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 82 kBChecksum SHA-512
ec7d41accb517349427588a2865c19bfbf323a8c25869f797af6d76fff25317519b1724549f60a8092b2df2521ce9e945e25443c452ddb76644a4db16fcbc824
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Eriksson, Linda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Linda
By organisation
Department of Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 216 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 530 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf