miun.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rethinking archives as digital: The consequences of ‘paper minds’ in illustrations and definitions of ‘e-archives’
Mittuniversitetet, Fakulteten för naturvetenskap, teknik och medier, Avdelningen för informationssystem och -teknologi.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6342-0393
Mittuniversitetet, Fakulteten för naturvetenskap, teknik och medier, Avdelningen för informationssystem och -teknologi.
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Archivaria, ISSN 1923-6409, Vol. 83, nr Spring, s. 81-108Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Culture and discourses affect our understanding of the archive in the digital environment: preconceptions, norms and practices developed in a paper-based administration color and limit perceptions of digital archives. It can be difficult to re-imagine the archive in the context of e-Government, and the networked environment, which increases the complexity of archival issues. This is a global problem, because digital records require other measures than paper records. This takes a foundational approach, focusing on openings and closures of concepts surrounding the idea of archives. Critical theory is used as a lens to study illustrations and descriptions of what an ‘e-archive’ is, and how it should be managed.

 

The analysis is made after three basic principles that the public administration should work towards: (i) a holistic concept of the archive, (ii) a proactive approach to records management, and (iii) striving to integrate the archiving process with the goals and opportunities of e-government.

 

The result indicates that the lack of ‘closings’: commonly understood principles and a shared definition of an e-archive, may restrict the understanding of archives in digital contexts and constrain the development of their full potential. At the same time, the lack of ‘openings’ toward new ways of thinking about and designing e-archives may narrow the scope of possibilities that the digital formats can offer. ‘Paper minds’ may presuppose a ‘stepwise progression’ of records from ‘active’ to ‘archival’ that is unnecessary in the digital context.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Association of Canadian Archivists , 2017. Vol. 83, nr Spring, s. 81-108
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-29997Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85026815633OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-29997DiVA, id: diva2:1071766
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-02-06 Laget: 2017-02-06 Sist oppdatert: 2018-11-06bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Closer Together or Further Apart?: Public administration and archives in the digital age
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Closer Together or Further Apart?: Public administration and archives in the digital age
2017 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The research presented in this thesis is about recordkeeping in the public sector, focusing especially on the relationship between the public administration and its archives, and selected aspects affecting the way this relationship is developing in the digital era. Two research questions are addressed: RQ1: What are ‘archives’ and ‘recordkeeping’ in the digital context and the developing e-government? RQ2: What are the indications of current and future challenges regarding the cooperation between public administration and archives? Six studies resulting in six papers form the basis of the thesis. Each study explores a unique aspect of how current developments, discussions, and decisions affect contemporary understanding and practices regarding archives and recordkeeping. Public records are authoritative information resources, crucial in the everyday lives of citizens. Public recordkeeping develops continuously alongside administrative practices, technological achievements, and political goals. Examples include the development of shared services within the public sector and the involvement of the private sector in public infrastructure projects through outsourcing. These processes are currently affected both by digital technologies, which offer new possibilities to create, use, and preserve records, and by e-government, characterized by the combination of information and communication technologies with organizational change to improve public services and democratic participation. In these processes, existing practices are reviewed and revised, and the concepts of ‘archives’ and ‘recordkeeping’ redefined. The research was pursued using an interpretive approach. The research methods used were concept analysis; discourse analysis; literary warrant analysis; phenomenography; critical theory; and the records continuum model as a theoretical structure. The results shows that common usage of the terms ‘archive’ and ‘recordkeeping’ is fluid and changing, which can make decision-making challenging and affect the relationship between archives and administration. Efforts to develop recordkeeping strategies may be hampered by factors related to the different ways in which the nature and role of archives and recordkeeping are perceived, including differing understandings of related concepts; varying discourses on what an archive (or e-archive) is or should be, and different ways of interpreting legal frameworks and their significance.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University, 2017. s. 102
Serie
Mid Sweden University doctoral thesis, ISSN 1652-893X ; 269
Emneord
archives, digital work processes, discourse, outsourcing, public sector agencies, recordkeeping, records continuum model, Sweden
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-31636 (URN)978-91-88527-25-7 (ISBN)
Disputas
2017-10-19, L111, Holmgatan 10, Sundsvall, 13:15 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Prosjekter
God informationsförvaltningEn effektiv digital informationshantering
Merknad

Vid tidpunkten för disputationen var följande delarbeten opublicerade: delarbete 6 accepterat.

At the time of the doctoral defence the following papers were unpublished: paper 6 accepted.

Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-09-19 Laget: 2017-09-18 Sist oppdatert: 2018-01-13bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Scopushttp://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria

Personposter BETA

Klareld, Ann-SofieLindblad-Gidlund, Katarina

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Klareld, Ann-SofieLindblad-Gidlund, Katarina
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 1135 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf