miun.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management
Stockholm Environm Inst, Mistra Council Evidence Based Environm Management, Stockholm.
Stockholm Environm Inst, Mistra Council Evidence Based Environm Management, Stockholm.
Mittuniversitetet, Fakulteten för naturvetenskap, teknik och medier, Avdelningen för naturvetenskap.
Lund Univ, Dept Biol, Lund.
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: Ambio, ISSN 0044-7447, E-ISSN 1654-7209, Vol. 45, nr 5, s. 613-620Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Reviews of evidence are a vital means of summarising growing bodies of research. Systematic reviews (SRs) aim to reduce bias and increase reliability when summarising high priority and controversial topics. Similar to SRs, systematic maps (SMs) were developed in social sciences to reliably catalogue evidence on a specific subject. Rather than providing answers to specific questions of impacts, SMs aim to produce searchable databases of studies, along with detailed descriptive information. These maps (consisting of a report, a database, and sometimes a geographical information system) can prove highly useful for research, policy and practice communities, by providing assessments of knowledge gaps (subjects requiring additional research), knowledge gluts (subjects where full SR is possible), and patterns across the research literature that promote best practice and direct research resources towards the highest quality research. Here, we introduce SMs in detail using three recent case studies that demonstrate their utility for research and decision-making.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2016. Vol. 45, nr 5, s. 613-620
Emneord [en]
Environmental policy, Evidence review, Evidence-informed policy, Forestry, Secondary synthesis, Soil carbon
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-29138DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0773-xISI: 000381580800009PubMedID: 26984257Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84962593151OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-29138DiVA, id: diva2:1040315
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-10-27 Laget: 2016-10-27 Sist oppdatert: 2017-08-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(526 kB)145 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 526 kBChecksum SHA-512
9b9d88bd3adb7402f112bdc2186beffc6e0ed665d6acda6b89023064fd51c57f691b1135c82f4fbe657361ffbb717baf5e6867c3818cb18c118ee152baab28ba
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Jonsson, Bengt Gunnar

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Jonsson, Bengt Gunnar
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Ambio

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 145 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 201 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf