miun.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validating abbreviated measures of effort-reward imbalance at work in European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium
Department of Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Department of Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland .
Department of Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2014 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, ISSN 0340-0131, E-ISSN 1432-1246, Vol. 87, nr 3, s. 249-256Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Effort-reward imbalance (ERI) is an established conceptualisation of work stress. Although a validated effort-reward questionnaire is available for public use, many epidemiological studies adopt shortened scales and proxy measures. To examine the agreement between different abbreviated measures and the original instrument, we compared different versions of the effort-reward scales available in 15 European cohort studies participating in the IPD-Work (Individual-participant-data meta-analysis in working populations) consortium. Five of the 15 studies provide information on the original ('complete') scales measuring 'effort' and 'reward', whereas the 10 remaining studies used 'partial' scales. To compare different versions of the ERI scales, we analyse individual-level data from 31,790 participants from the five studies with complete scales. Pearson's correlation between partial and complete scales was very high in case of 'effort' (where 2 out of 3 items were used) and very high or high in case of 'reward', if at least 4 items (out of 7) were included. Reward scales composed of 3 items revealed good to satisfactory agreement, and in one case, a reward scale consisting of 2 items only demonstrated a modest, but still acceptable degree of agreement. Sensitivity and specificity of a composite measure, the ratio of effort and reward, comparing partial versus complete scales ranged between 59-93 and 85-99 %, respectively. Complete and partial scales were strongly associated with poor self-rated health. Our results support the notion that short proxy measures or partial versions of the original scales can be used to assess effort-reward imbalance.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2014. Vol. 87, nr 3, s. 249-256
Emneord [en]
Effort-reward imbalance, Work stress, IPD-Work, Abbreviated measures, European cohort studies
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-22014DOI: 10.1007/s00420-013-0855-zISI: 000332953300003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84899420626OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-22014DiVA, id: diva2:720948
Tilgjengelig fra: 2014-06-03 Laget: 2014-05-28 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-05bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Knutsson, Anders

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Knutsson, Anders
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 127 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf