miun.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Updated reliability and normative values for the standing heel-rise test in healthy adults
The University of Waikato, Tauranga, New Zealand.
The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Mittuniversitetet, Fakulteten för humanvetenskap, Avdelningen för hälsovetenskap. (Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre)ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6653-3414
University of Gothenburg.
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Physiotherapy, ISSN 0031-9406, E-ISSN 1873-1465, Vol. 103, nr 4, s. 446-452Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: The heel-rise test is used to assess the strength and endurance of the plantar flexors in everyday clinical practice. However, several factors may affect outcomes, including sex, age, body mass index and activity level. The aims of this study were to revisit the reliability and normative values of this test, and establish normative equations accounting for several factors. Design: Cross-sectional observational study with test-retest. Setting: Community. Participants: Volunteers (n = 566, age 20 to 81 years). Interventions: Subjects performed single-legged heel rises to fatigue, standing on a 10° incline, once on each leg. A subset of subjects (n = 32) repeated the test 1 week later. Reliability was quantified using intraclass (ICC) correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots (mean difference [95% limits of agreement (LOA)]), whereas the impact of sex, age, body mass index and activity level on the number of heel rises was determined using non-parametric regression models. Results: The test showed excellent reliability (ICC = 1.0 right leg, 1.0 left leg), with mean between-day differences in the total number of heel-rise repetitions of 0.2 (95% LOA -6.2 to 6.5) and 0.1 (95% LOA -6.1 to 6.2) for right and left legs, respectively. Overall, males completed more repetitions than females (median 24 vs 21). However, older females (age >60. years) outperformed older males. According to the model, younger males with higher activity levels can complete the most heel rises. Conclusions: The heel-rise test is highly reliable. The regression models herein can be employed by clinicians to evaluate the outcomes of heel-rise tests of individuals against a comparable normative population.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2017. Vol. 103, nr 4, s. 446-452
Emneord [en]
Lower extremity, Muscle strength, Physical examination, Regression analysis, Rehabilitation, Reproducibility of results
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-32204DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.03.002ISI: 000415611100015PubMedID: 28886865Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85028702489OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-32204DiVA, id: diva2:1161913
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-12-01 Laget: 2017-12-01 Sist oppdatert: 2018-02-22bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Alricsson, Marie

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Alricsson, Marie
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Physiotherapy

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 151 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf