miun.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Große, Christine, Fil.LicORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-4869-5094
Publications (10 of 13) Show all publications
Nyman, M. & Große, C. (2019). Are You Ready When It Counts?: IT Consulting Firm’s Information Security Incident Management. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP): . Paper presented at 5th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP), Prague, Czech Republic, 23-25 February, 2019 (pp. 26-37). SciTePress, 1
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Are You Ready When It Counts?: IT Consulting Firm’s Information Security Incident Management
2019 (English)In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP), SciTePress, 2019, Vol. 1, p. 26-37Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Information security incidents are increasing both in number and in scope. In consequence, the General Data Protection Regulation and the Directive on security of network and information systems force organisations to report such incidents to a supervision authority. Due to the growing of both the importance of managing incidents and the tendency to outsourcing, this study focuses on IT-consulting firms and highlights their vulnerable position as subcontractors. This study thereby addresses the lack of empirical research on incident management and contributes valuable insights in IT-consulting firms’ experiences with information security incident management. Evidence from interviews and a survey with experts at IT-consulting firms focuses on challenges in managing information security incidents. The analyses identify and clarify both new and known challenges, such as how the recent regulations affect the role of an IT-consulting firm and how the absence of major incidents influences stakeholder awareness. Improvements of IT-consulting firm’s incident management process need to address internal and external communication, the information security awareness of employees and customers and the adequacy of the cost focus.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SciTePress, 2019
Keywords
Security Awareness, Information Security Incident Management, IT Consulting, GDPR, NIS Directive
National Category
Information Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-35902 (URN)10.5220/0007247500260037 (DOI)2-s2.0-85064667686 (Scopus ID)978-989-758-359-9 (ISBN)
Conference
5th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP), Prague, Czech Republic, 23-25 February, 2019
Available from: 2019-03-29 Created: 2019-03-29 Last updated: 2019-07-08Bibliographically approved
Große, C. & Olausson, P. M. (2019). Blind spots in interaction between actors in Swedish planning for critical infrastructure protection. Safety Science, 118, 424-434
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Blind spots in interaction between actors in Swedish planning for critical infrastructure protection
2019 (English)In: Safety Science, ISSN 0925-7535, E-ISSN 1879-1042, Vol. 118, p. 424-434Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Failures in the power supply threaten the safety of developed countries, as they are increasingly dependent on electricity to maintain important societal functions through critical infrastructure. To protect electricity-dependent critical infrastructure, Sweden has implemented a multi-level planning, called Styrel, which involves national-, regional- and local-level actors. This study focuses on interactions among key actors and their roles in the planning as well as the Swedish crisis management system. With evidence from interviews and a survey among the actors, analyses indicate blind spots in the current proceeding, such as the reliance of the outcome of the process on the actors’ commitment to achieve a common understanding of the importance of infrastructure assets and participate in collaborations. This paper reveals that actors lack awareness, knowledge, capability and resources to fulfil their roles in the national planning for critical infrastructure protection. By highlighting interrelations, this study contributes to the international discussion of identification, prioritisation and protection of critical infrastructure to mitigate consequences of power failures for a depending society.

Keywords
National safety, Governance networks, Complex system governance, Multi-level planning, Interaction, Critical infrastructure protection
National Category
Public Administration Studies Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-36248 (URN)10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.049 (DOI)000475999000042 ()2-s2.0-85066299123 (Scopus ID)
Projects
Från myndighet till medborgare och tillbaka: En studie av samverkan och kommunikation inom ramen för Styrel
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, 40307-1
Available from: 2019-06-04 Created: 2019-06-04 Last updated: 2019-08-12Bibliographically approved
Große, C. (2019). Sources of Uncertainty in Swedish Emergency-Response Planning. Journal of Risk Research, 22(6), 758-772
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Sources of Uncertainty in Swedish Emergency-Response Planning
2019 (English)In: Journal of Risk Research, ISSN 1366-9877, E-ISSN 1466-4461, Vol. 22, no 6, p. 758-772Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

With the growing importance of enhancing modern society’s resilience, planning for critical infrastructure protection has become essential. However, such national planning must contend with many types of uncertainty. This paper characterises sources of uncertainty that are associated with a lack of knowledge, as exemplified by Swedish planning of emergency power supplies. The planning under investigation concerns civil protection from the negative effects of a power shortage. A decision process is intended to support this national strategic management goal by identifying and prioritising electricity consumers who are critical to society at the local, regional and national levels. The analysis of related documentation yields three sources of uncertainty (S) interrelated with this multi-level planning (MLP) for emergency response: (S1) the planning process in general, (S2) the decision-making process in particular and (S3) the direction and guidance alongside these processes. Interviews with decision-makers reveal a detailed specification of these sources of uncertainty. The results thus provide a solid basis for further goal-directed improvement of national MLP approaches. Moreover, this specification contributes to scholarly debate on the systemic effects of sources of uncertainty due to a lack of knowledge. Lastly, the findings constitute a thinking framework that is suggested as a foundation for analytical work in similar complex planning environments as well as for evidence-based communication to the wider public concerning risks and resilience.

Keywords
complex planning environment, Critical infrastructure protection, decision process, emergency power supply, multi-level planning, public strategic management
National Category
Information Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-32823 (URN)10.1080/13669877.2018.1459796 (DOI)000475942700008 ()2-s2.0-85045453081 (Scopus ID)
Note

Published online: 16 Apr 2018

Available from: 2018-02-09 Created: 2018-02-09 Last updated: 2019-08-12Bibliographically approved
Große, C., Olausson, P. M. & Wallman Lundåsen, S. (2018). Blackout ahead: Methodological Concerns in Studies of National Crisis Management. In: : . Paper presented at Society of Risk Analysis - Nordic Chapter, Stavanger, 8-9 November, 2018. Stavanger
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Blackout ahead: Methodological Concerns in Studies of National Crisis Management
2018 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This paper highlights the difficulties in the studies of the crisis management system. Our focus is on the Swedish planning process in the case of power shortage, called Styrel. Our paper depart from a research project entitled From Authorities to Citizens and Back. The aim of the project is to increase the knowledge on the decision-making processes within Styrel with a focus on how the actors co-operate within the planning process, and what consequences the priorities of socially important objects have for society and its citizens. Methodologically, the project is based on document studies, interview with security officers in forty-seven municipalities, three coordinators at the County administrative board (CAB), and representatives for local power grid companies. Furthermore, a survey has been conducted with all coordinators at the CAB. The intended objective has also been to take part of the planning documents in order to investigate if there are any differences between how the objects were prioritized by the municipalities and how they were finally prioritized. Our experience from the study reviles problems with availability of relevant planning material, lack of knowledge due to deficient continuity at the local level regarding those responsible for Styrel, and finally difficulties in following individual objects during the planning process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stavanger: , 2018
Keywords
Energy policy; critical infrastructure, public policy, methods
National Category
Public Administration Studies Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-35618 (URN)
Conference
Society of Risk Analysis - Nordic Chapter, Stavanger, 8-9 November, 2018
Available from: 2019-02-11 Created: 2019-02-11 Last updated: 2019-02-12Bibliographically approved
Olausson, P. M. & Große, C. (2018). Multi-Level Planning Systems for Critical Infrastructure Protection:: Planning for Power Shortage in Germany, Sweden and USA. In: : . Paper presented at Mid-Western Political Science Association 76th annual conference, Chicago, April 5–8, 2018. Chicago
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Multi-Level Planning Systems for Critical Infrastructure Protection:: Planning for Power Shortage in Germany, Sweden and USA
2018 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Electricity is a key resource for the majority of societal functions and constitutes an important sector in the critical infrastructure of modern societies. Disturbances in power supply can have cascading effects on interdependent public sectors and ordinary citizens (Rinaldi et al., 2001; Cohen, 2010; Ghanem et al., 2016). However, it seems nearly impossible to prevent the occurrence of power shortages. This has been evident in the aftermath of the hurricane Lee and the hurricane Maria in 2017. Because of the changing climate, an increase of hurricanes, flooding, and high river flows, are expected. The need of a national energy policy have been addressed (see e.g. Hoffman, 2015), including policy for manual power cut in the case of power shortage. The Swedish Energy Agency has developed a national policy for handling national power shortage. The policy, called STYREL is part of Swedish Crisis Management System. This paper focus on the Swedish power shortage policy, STYREL in relation to national policies in Germany and the USA. The aim is to compare the three countries policies in the event of power shortage. The focus is on the organization of the planning process, which actors are part of the process, and how the societal important users are identified and ranked. Policy networks, including actors from both public and private sector are of special interest.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Chicago: , 2018
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-35616 (URN)
Conference
Mid-Western Political Science Association 76th annual conference, Chicago, April 5–8, 2018
Available from: 2019-02-11 Created: 2019-02-11 Last updated: 2019-02-12Bibliographically approved
Danielsson, E., Petridou, E., Lundgren, M., Olofsson, A., Große, C. & Röslmaier, M. (2018). Risk Communication: A Comparative Study of Eight EU Countries. MSB
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Risk Communication: A Comparative Study of Eight EU Countries
Show others...
2018 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

How do EU member states communicate risks to their citizens? In this study, we define risk communication as the information provided by different levels of government to citizens regarding possible future crises. The questions serving as departure points for this study are as follows: How is the administrative system for risk communication set up in the countries studied? How the different risk communication campaigns are (provided that they exist) embedded in the larger administrative context? How is risk communication strategy formulated in each country and what kind of threats are emphasized? In order to tackle these questions, we examine the risk communication strategy of eight countries: Sweden, Finland, Germany, England, France, Estonia, Greece and Cyprus. Our data consist of governmental web sites, publications, campaigns, as well as other modes of communication, such as videos posted on YouTube, with questions centering on institutional actors, methods of delivery, content, and effectiveness. We acknowledge that risk communication aims at supporting vulnerable populations and evening out imbalances, but at the same time we flesh out the power dimension of risk. In our analysis, we search for reproduction of norms and social inequality in risk communication practices. The results show that some patterns emerge regarding the way different EU countries convey information to the public, but they do not hold strictly to geography or administrative system. Digital media are the foremost vehicle of risk communication and the message generally conveyed is geared towards traditional, middle class households with the main language of the country as their first language. Volunteer organizations are present in all the countries in question, though not at the same degree. The conveyance of “self-protection” guidelines implicitly places the responsibility of protection to the individual. The results also show that in some countries, materiality has become more prevalent than the social dimension of risk in the message the public sector conveys, and that there is a move from focusing on risk to focusing on security.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MSB, 2018. p. 71
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-35027 (URN)978-91-7383-868-9 (ISBN)
Funder
Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency
Available from: 2018-12-03 Created: 2018-12-03 Last updated: 2019-01-14Bibliographically approved
Große, C. (2018). Strategic Objectives in Complex Planning Environments: Insights from a Swedish Case for Critical Infrastructure Protection. (Licentiate dissertation). Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Strategic Objectives in Complex Planning Environments: Insights from a Swedish Case for Critical Infrastructure Protection
2018 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Large-scale and long-term planning imposes extensive requirements on governance efforts regardless of whether it involves public organisations, private organisations, or both. The proportions of such planning entangle many actors and stakeholders as system components within and around a complex system. These system components and conditions in a complex planning environment introduce a diverse variety of strategic objectives into the planning. This study investigates how strategic objectives can affect the governance of complex planning systems, particularly in the context of national critical infrastructure protection. For this purpose, this thesis concentrates on a national planning procedure, STYREL, which Sweden has recently implemented for the case of power shortages. This case involves various actors from the national, regional and local levels who act on behalf of both public and private organisations in a planning process with four-year intervals, and it thus constitutes a relevant subject for this study. The investigation entailed the collection of evidence from documents and interviews. First, publicly available Swedish documents regarding the case provided an understanding of the planning. Second, interviews with decision-makers who are entrusted with this planning at municipalities and county administrative boards as well as with a few planners from power grid providers offered a deeper comprehension of both the proceedings in practice and the strategic objectives involved in this complex system for planning of critical infrastructure protection. Particularly, the findings resulted in several conceptual models that demonstrate these understandings in more detail. A soft system model visualises the problem situation and contains several elements, such as the system components, interrelations and conditions. Moreover, a multi-level planning model specifies sources of uncertainty in the planning and decision-making process that are associated with an insufficient alignment of strategic objectives in the STYREL case. These decompositions of the Swedish planning environment – both horizontal and vertical – further enabled this study to identify significant parameters of the systemic conditions and strategic objectives involved in such complex planning environments that challenge their governance. The findings of this study suggest that the Swedish process is not yet fully developed. The investigation particularly indicates that a better alignment of strategic objectives is necessary to ensure a selection of adequate goals and means that advances the future usability of the produced plan, which in turn would legitimate and strengthen this complex planning process for critical infrastructure protection.

Abstract [sv]

Storskalig och långvarig planering ställer höga krav på styrning. Detta gäller oavsett om offentliga eller privata organisationer, eller båda, är involverade. Omfattningen av en sådan planering engagerar många aktörer och intressenter som komponenter inom och omkring ett komplext system. Dessa komponenter samt deras villkor inbäddade i en komplex planeringsmiljö skapar en mångfald av strategiska målbilder som följer med in till planeringen. Denna studie undersöker därför hur strategiska målbilder kan påverka styrningen av komplexa planeringssystem, särskilt i kontexten av skyddet av kritisk infrastruktur i samhället. Undersökningen fokuserar på en nationell planeringsprocess, kallad STYREL, som avser beredskapsplanering för elbristsituationer och som implementerats i Sverige. Planeringsmiljön omkring STYREL är ett relevant studieobjekt eftersom den involverar många aktörer från nationell, regional och lokal nivå. Dessa aktörer representerar offentliga och privata organisationer i den planeringsprocess som genomförs med fyraårsintervaller. Under undersökningens gång har bevis samlats in från dokument och intervjustudier. Först har offentlig tillgängliga dokument om fallet skapat en förståelse om planeringen. Intervjuer med beslutsfattare som är ansvariga för STYREL-planeringen hos länsstyrelser, kommuner samt elnätsbolag har sedan genererat en ännu djupare förståelse. Detta gällande både förfaringssättet i praktiken och de strategiska målbilder som är involverade i detta komplexa system för planering av kritisk infrastruktur-skydd. Resultaten ledde i synnerhet till några konceptuella modeller vilka demonstrerar förståelserna på ett detaljerat sätt. En systemmodell visualiserar problemsituationen och innehåller flera element såsom systemkomponenter, relationer och villkor. En multinivå-planeringsmodell specificerar källor av osäkerhet i planerings- och beslutsprocessen vilka är associerade med en otillräcklig harmonisering av strategiska målbilder i STYREL fallet. Dekompositionerna av den svenska planeringsmiljön – både horisontellt och vertikalt – gjorde det möjligt att identifiera signifikanta parametrar av de systemiska villkor och strategiska målbilder som är involverade i dessa komplexa planeringsmiljöer och utmanar deras styrning. Resultaten av studien indikerar att den svenska processen inte är fullt utvecklat. Undersökningen visar att en bättre harmonisering av strategiska målbilder är nödvändig för att säkerställa ett urval av adekvata mål och medel som skulle utveckla den framtida användbarheten av den producerade planen. Denna skulle i sin tur legitimera och stärka den komplexa planeringsprocessen för skyddet av kritisk infrastruktur. Därtill kunde detta främja en målgruppsorienterad kommunikation om risker och relevanta åtgärder.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University, 2018. p. 64
Series
Mid Sweden University licentiate thesis, ISSN 1652-8948 ; 136
Keywords
Systemic Thinking, Soft Operations Research, design-oriented Information Systems Research, Governance, Complex Systems, Critical Infrastructure Protection, Largescale Planning, Multi-level Planning, Strategic Management
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-32820 (URN)978-91-88527-39-4 (ISBN)
Presentation
2018-03-07, M 207, Holmgatan 10, Sundsvall, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, 40307-1
Note

Vid tidpunkten för framläggningen av avhandlingen var följande delarbeten opublicerade: delarbete 1 under granskning, delarbete 3 under granskning.

At the time of the defence the following papers were unpublished: paper 1 under review, paper 3 under review.

Available from: 2018-02-09 Created: 2018-02-09 Last updated: 2019-04-11Bibliographically approved
Große, C. & Olausson, P. M. (2018). Swedish Multi-Level Planning System for Critical Infrastructure Protection: The Regional Core. In: Stein Haugen, Anne Barros, Coen van Gulijk, Trond Kongsvik, Jan Erik Vinnem (Ed.), Haugen, A. Barros, C. van Gulijk, T. Kongsvik & J.-E. Vinnem (Ed.), Safety and Reliability: Safe Societies in a Changing World. Paper presented at 28th International European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2018, Trondheim, Norway, 17–21 June 2018 (pp. 1893-1901). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Swedish Multi-Level Planning System for Critical Infrastructure Protection: The Regional Core
2018 (English)In: Safety and Reliability: Safe Societies in a Changing World / [ed] Haugen, A. Barros, C. van Gulijk, T. Kongsvik & J.-E. Vinnem, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, 2018, p. 1893-1901Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

With its growing dependence on electricity, modern society faces the risk of cascading failureof interconnected societal functions. To protect societal functions during an event of power shortage,Sweden has implemented a multi-level planning process called STYREL, which involves national-, regional—and local-level actors. As part of the Swedish crisis management system, the regional body operatesas a co-ordinator that organises co-operation and interaction between private and public actors. Thisstudy examines the role of the regional hub in STYREL and the collaboration and co-operation betweenplanning levels. It focuses on the co-ordinator’s perspective and presents evidence from interviews and asurvey among planners at County Administrative Boards, entrusted with the supervision and executionof STYREL within their regional area of responsibility. This paper indicates that the regional co-ordinatorlacks the awareness, knowledge and resources to fulfil its core function in the national planning for criticalinfrastructure protection.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, 2018
Keywords
Governance networks, Complex system governance, Multi-level planningInteraction, Critical infrastructure protection
National Category
Information Systems Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-35086 (URN)10.1201/9781351174664 (DOI)2-s2.0-85058083439 (Scopus ID)978-1-351-17466-4 (ISBN)
Conference
28th International European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2018, Trondheim, Norway, 17–21 June 2018
Available from: 2018-12-06 Created: 2018-12-06 Last updated: 2019-09-09
Große, C. (2018). The systemic implications of emergent strategic objectives in complex planning situations. In: ICORES 2018 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems: . Paper presented at 7th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems, ICORES 2018, Madeira, Portugal, 24 January 2018 through 26 January 2018 (pp. 287-296). SciTePress
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The systemic implications of emergent strategic objectives in complex planning situations
2018 (English)In: ICORES 2018 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems, SciTePress, 2018, p. 287-296Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper develops a model for analysing systemic implications of strategic objectives in the context of national emergency response planning for the case of an electrical power shortage. Drawing on evidence from the Swedish approach, STYREL, the study emphasises the need for a thorough consideration of the various interests that are involved in such a complex system of national multi-level planning. This model provides a novel approach for analysing strategic objectives in complex planning environments, thereby offering a context for a constructive dialogue about strategic objectives, reachable goals and appropriate means among actors who are involved in such planning as well as the stakeholders it affects. Even beyond national critical infrastructure protection (CIP), the contribution of this paper is twofold: it outlines a complex problem for operations research in general and suggests a systematic approach for examining strategic objectives in complex planning environments in particular. Hence, this paper encourages a discussion of systemic implications of these various interests and an enhancement of collaboration and mutual understanding to facilitate decision-making in public and private strategic management. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SciTePress, 2018
Keywords
Critical Infrastructure Protection, Decision Support, Emergency Response Planning, Multi-level Planning, Strategic Management, Styrel
National Category
Information Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-34341 (URN)10.5220/0006646302870296 (DOI)2-s2.0-85047898229 (Scopus ID)9789897582851 (ISBN)
Conference
7th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems, ICORES 2018, Madeira, Portugal, 24 January 2018 through 26 January 2018
Note

This study is supported by the Swedish Energy Agency alongside the project: ‘Från myndighet till medborgare och tillbaka: En studie av samverkan och kommunikation inom ramen för Styrel’, which is gratefully acknowledged.

Available from: 2018-09-05 Created: 2018-09-05 Last updated: 2018-12-14Bibliographically approved
Große, C. (2017). Applying Systems Thinking onto Emergency Response Planning: Using Soft Systems Methodology to Structure a National Act in Sweden. In: Federico Liberatore; Greg H. Parlier and Marc Demange (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems, Porto, Portugal, February 23-25, 2017: . Paper presented at International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems - ICORES (pp. 288-297). SciTePress
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Applying Systems Thinking onto Emergency Response Planning: Using Soft Systems Methodology to Structure a National Act in Sweden
2017 (English)In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems, Porto, Portugal, February 23-25, 2017 / [ed] Federico Liberatore; Greg H. Parlier and Marc Demange, SciTePress, 2017, p. 288-297Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper outlines a soft systems method approach to model a national preparedness planning procedure for the case of an electrical power shortage. Through the model, we provide a new perspective on enhancing and understanding the joint decision-making environment for the actors involved in the planning procedure, as well as its underlying power structure. By a process of abstraction from the current implementation, a core root definition is presented which provides a generic systems view that can be a useful concept for the study of similar contexts. An action model dedicated to determining meaningful and valid activities is derived, providing insights for the improvement of collaborative emergency response planning in general. The paper, thus, aims to contribute to the communication and cooperation between actors and stakeholders in the development of appropriate decision processes and decision support in the context of emergency preparedness.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SciTePress, 2017
Keywords
Soft Systems Methodology, Operations Research, Emergency Response Planning, Decision Support, Styrel
National Category
Information Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-30573 (URN)10.5220/0006126202880297 (DOI)000413254200030 ()2-s2.0-85047917029 (Scopus ID)978-989-758-218-9 (ISBN)
Conference
International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems - ICORES
Projects
Från myndighet till medborgare och tillbaka: En studie av samverkan och kommunikation inom ramen för Styrel
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, 40307-1
Available from: 2017-04-04 Created: 2017-04-04 Last updated: 2019-08-20Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-4869-5094

Search in DiVA

Show all publications